Skip to main content

Potluck Dinners

After being at GFC for a number of years, I wanted to find a way for the church to feel more togetherness, and potluck dinners seemed like an obvious strategy. After all, when we were in St. Louis, the church there had a potluck every single Sunday, and it turned out to be an incredible tool for church growth—so much so that the local newspaper made a big deal of it when they profiled the church.

The GFC potluck turned out to be the most archetypically GFC thing we had ever done. And it was a disaster.

My potluck renaissance wasn't the first time GFC had tried to eat together. After all, everyone on the Farm participated in Farm Dinners, but those were all prepared by one household (which really means they were prepared by one woman), and shared with the single people who lived on the Farm. But those weren't dinners for the church as a group. And there had been occasional church dinner events, but the normal strategy was for each family to stake out their territory at their table, so the "together" part was about as together as eating with your family at a restaurant in a strange city. This "family table" strategy meant that I ended up sitting alone on a piano bench to eat alone at one church meal because I wasn't in anyone's family.

I wanted to see something better, so I approached one of the elders with the idea. The response was predictable. Pretty much every ministry idea got the same response: "If you want to do that, go ahead. We're not going to oppose you, but we're not going to support you either." And as usual, there was no money available to help with the idea.

That was enough for me, so I went ahead, set a date, and made announcements several Sundays in a row.

People loved the idea. They all showed up. I wasn't surprised that they all staked their claims to "family tables," and I had expected to pay for paper plates, coffee, and lemonade, so that part wasn't much of a surprise either. The part that surprised me was how few people brought any food. Those who did bring food didn't bring very much: a family of four might bring one small dish of green beans. Back in St. Louis, we never had problems with food variety or with volume, but apparently in Ohio, "potluck dinner" meant "free meal."

I tried again the next month. This time, I included the exhortation to please bring some food. I remember saying that you should bring enough food to satisfy your family plus a visitor or two. It was a bit better this time, but not by much. One of the elders saw what was going on, though, and raced out to Kentucky Fried to supplement the paltry offerings.

Running out of food at the church potluck was pretty typical in those first few attempts, so it wasn't unusual for the last few people in line to go out to Taco Bell and bring their food back. I did that a couple of times, reaping the ire of church leaders.

For a couple more months, I made a point of buying two or three large restaurant-size pans of lasagne at Gordon Foods; after that I told the elders that I was about done with the experiment. It was expensive, and I never could recruit people to help clean up either, so it was all my project. They did lend some organizing assistance by making the announcements and assigning menu items: depending on your place in the alphabet, you would bring a main dish AND a salad or a main dish AND a dessert. That got me out of the kitchen, but the whole thing was just a lot of trouble, and we never had enough food, so finally we just gave up because eating a buffet meal with your family in a church building wasn't that much of an improvement over eating a meal with your family at home.

The coffee hour aftermath

The "eating together as an evangelistic strategy" idea did take root among the elders, though, so they decided it would be good to have a coffee hour after church, but in typical GFC fashion, they bollixed the whole thing up. The menu was coffee or tea plus cookies, offered at the back of the main room after worship. So far, so good. But because it was an evangelistic strategy and because (as usual) there was very little money, there was a general announcement that the coffee was ONLY for visitors. Not for regular members. That was really awkward, because (when the scheme worked as planned) the only people with coffee and cookies were newcomers. The rest of us had hustled out the door as usual. It took several months for everyone to figure out just how uncomfortable that made the newcomers and how the regular members felt at being left out.

—Curt Allen

Comments

  1. The us/them dichotomy was not subtle. The rules in place at all functions - formal and otherwise - created immense discomfort and a place where belonging only came with pleasing leaders. Thank you for creating this space. - Jacie

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Pastoral Counseling

For me, coming from a big city to Mansfield, it was striking just how many stand-alone "pastoral counselors" there were. Grace Haven had one whose office was in the Lodge (which makes sense, I guess, because there wasn't really a pastor over the whole body). Anyhow, when I look at Google, there are still more than a dozen counseling offices, most of them lining Lexington Avenue. Ashland Seminary seems to be the source of all these counselors—two years (64 credits) and you're a professional. (Most of the courses are three hour "Introduction to" courses, and six of those credits are hands-on practicum hours.) The appeal to the Christian community is obvious. Aside from the Evangelical anti-expert bias, there has always been a suspicion that secular psychologists or psychiatrists would try to talk Christian patients out of their faith (which would actually be a serious breach of professional ethics). Secular mental health profes

A bit of background

What follows is a very personal history of Grace Fellowship Church in Mansfield, Ohio. It's not going to be chronological, and I expect others will pitch in their bits too. Two dangers face me/us in this project. One is that the product will look and sound something like a Hallmark greeting card, all sunny days and flowers in the meadow. The other extreme, of course, is that GFC will come out looking a lot like Jim Jones' terrible Jonestown experiment (which, ironically, was doing its thing at about the time my family first encountered GFC). Grace Fellowship is/was really neither, though the title of this blog does make the point that for many of us it was a church which one survived , not one in which we thrived. A few mechanical details This is, at the start anyhow, very much one person's memories, but the blog isn't private at the moment. Anyone who knows the URL can see it. I'm going to enable comments, but keep them moderated. There are a lot of other people

Kids of Leaders, and a personal note

The original point of this blog was to help me in my personal healing journey, and during the last year or so, I've made a lot of progress—which also explains, at least partially, why I haven't had anything to say for a long time. But I began thinking about Grace Fellowship, and one very curious fact has really jumped out at me. (I ran into Bob Gardner the other day, discussed this with him, and he agrees.) The whole point of Grace Haven Farm, back in the 1970s, was that the culture of the typical church just didn't relate that well with the young people of the day. Church folks wore nice suits, sat in pews, and sang hymns, and none of that appealed to the kids, either those inside the church or those outside. Thus one point of the Jesus People movement was to free the Christian message from those cultural trappings that didn't work too well. Grace Haven was right in the middle of all that, and blue jeans, love beads, dancing in the meadow and guitar music were the nor